You have raised good points in the arguments, but the judicial references are not satisfactory
Islamabad (UrduLight.com) Chief Justice on the review petition of Election Commission related to Punjab elections in the Supreme Court while talking to the lawyer Election Commission said that you have raised good points in the arguments, the court references on these points are not satisfactory. are
According to the private TV channel Dunya News, a hearing was held in the Supreme Court on the review petition of the Election Commission related to the Punjab elections. .
Lawyer Election Commission said that the right of appeal is not given in Article 184, the scope of review cannot be limited due to lack of right of appeal, the court has to take into account the requirements of justice in the review, the court should not fall into the procedure of the code in the review. Should, a new point can be raised in constitutional cases.
Justice Muneeb Akhtar said, is your argument that the revision in 184 three should be heard like an appeal? Advocate Election Commission said that the revision in 184 three is actually an appeal.
The Chief Justice, talking to the lawyer Election Commission, said that you have raised good points in the arguments, the court references on these points are not satisfactory, Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan said that if your argument is accepted, it will have to be heard again in the revision, in the constitution. It is not written that the scope of review and appeal will be the same. Advocate Election Commission said that the scope has not been limited in the constitution. Not given the right.
